Enhancement of a profile photo system

ABSTRACT

Embodiments can provide a computer implemented method in a data processing system comprising a processor and a memory, the memory comprising instructions that are executed by the processor to cause the processor to implement a system for providing profile photo enhancement, the method comprising receiving, from an online platform, one or more specifications for image acceptance criteria; receiving, through an uploading user, a plurality of images; receiving, through a requesting user, a request to view an image; selecting a particular specification for image acceptance criteria; for each image in the plurality of images: examining, through an image processing toolbox, the image to determine if the image acceptance criteria are met; if all acceptance criteria are met, providing the image to the requesting user; if one or more acceptance criteria are not met, taking one or more actions to process the image, reexamining, through the image processing toolbox, the processed image to determine if the image acceptance criteria are met; if all acceptance criteria are met, providing the processed image to the requesting user; and if one or more of the image acceptance criteria are not met, disregarding the processed image for the particular specification for image acceptance criteria.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.15/244,717, filed on Aug. 23, 2016, which is incorporated herein byreference in its entirety.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present application relates generally to a system and method thatcan be used to determine, display, and create one or more imagesacceptable for one or more online networks having differingacceptability criteria.

BACKGROUND

Online social networks, such as LinkedIn, IBM Connections, Twitter, andFacebook, enable users to establish an online presence and identity tomore easily connect with users. Often the users use sharing of personalinformation (profile photo, photos, thoughts, etc.) in order to createconversation, generate awareness, share information, and get businessdone.

Particularly in enterprise social networks, identity/personalinformation is first seen by viewing users through the profile photo.From these profile photos, a viewer can get important information thatgoes beyond mere identification. The person may have a sense of humor, aunique perspective, or an extra dose of character imbued by parenthoodor hobbies.

In spite of promoting understanding of perspective, humor, andcharacter, there is little utility in the profile photo due to thedifficulty in translating a photograph into real-life identification,such as meeting at a conference. The problem originates with recognizingcontradictory requirements for profile photos in an enterprise socialcomputing platform. Good headshot photos help geographically dispersedteams form closer bonds by seeing their team members as more than just atext string identifying their names. Good headshot photos areparticularly helpful when the team has to come together for face to facemeetings or find one another in a crowded train station to meet upbefore proceeding to a customer meeting.

The contradiction arises between these utility needs of the enterpriseversus the users' need to be expressive with their profile photos. Thereis a method needed for ensuring that a photo provided by a user actuallymeets the criteria for which it is intended.

SUMMARY

Embodiments can provide a computer implemented method in a dataprocessing system comprising a processor and a memory, the memorycomprising instructions that are executed by the processor to cause theprocessor to implement a system for providing profile photo enhancement,the method comprising receiving, from an online platform, one or morespecifications for image acceptance criteria; receiving, through anuploading user, a plurality of images; receiving, through a requestinguser, a request to view an image; selecting a particular specificationfor image acceptance criteria; for each image in the plurality ofimages: examining, through an image processing toolbox, the image todetermine if the image acceptance criteria are met; if all acceptancecriteria are met, providing the image to the requesting user; if one ormore acceptance criteria are not met, taking one or more actions toprocess the image, reexamining, through the image processing toolbox,the processed image to determine if the image acceptance criteria aremet; if all acceptance criteria are met, providing the processed imageto the requesting user; and if one or more of the image acceptancecriteria are not met, disregarding the processed image for theparticular specification for image acceptance criteria.

Embodiments can further provide a method further comprising receiving,from an online platform, one or more specifications for image acceptancecriteria, wherein the image acceptance criteria include at least one of:a predetermined number of focus items, predetermined length and widthconstraints, predetermined color constraints, predetermined shapeconstraints, predetermined focus constraints, predetermined contrastratio constraints, a predetermined number of human faces present in theimage, and predetermined human face orientation constraints.

Embodiments can further provide a method further comprising receiving,through a subsequent requesting user, a request to view an image;selecting an alternate specification for image acceptance criteria; foreach image in the plurality of images: examining, through an imageprocessing toolbox, the image to determine if the alternate imageacceptance criteria are met; if all acceptance criteria are met,providing the image to the requesting user; if one or more alternateacceptance criteria are not met, taking one or more actions to processthe image, reexamining, through the image processing toolbox, theprocessed image to determine if the alternate image acceptance criteriaare met; if all alternate acceptance criteria are met, providing theprocessed image to the requesting user; and if one or more of thealternate image acceptance criteria are not met, disregarding theprocessed image for the alternate specification for image acceptancecriteria.

Embodiments can further provide a method further comprising determining,through a location module, the distance between the requesting user andthe uploading user; if the distance between the requesting user and theuploading user is greater than a predetermined threshold, selecting aparticular specification for image acceptance criteria; and if thedistance between the requesting user and the uploading user is notgreater than a predetermined threshold, selecting an alternatespecification for image acceptance criteria.

Embodiments can further provide a method further comprising determiningwhether a formal connection exists between the requesting user and theuploading user; if a formal connection exists between the requestinguser and the uploading user, selecting a particular specification forimage acceptance criteria; and if a formal connection does not existbetween the requesting user and the uploading user, selecting analternate specification for image acceptance criteria.

Embodiments can further provide a method further comprising if a formalconnection exists between the requesting user and the uploading user,determining the duration the formal connection has existed; if theformal connection has existed for longer than a predetermined threshold,selecting a particular specification for image acceptance criteria; andif the formal connection has existed for shorter than a predeterminedthreshold, selecting an alternate specification for image acceptancecriteria.

Embodiments can further provide a method further comprising for eachimage in the plurality of images, prompting the uploading user tocategorize the image according to an intent associated with the one ormore specifications of image acceptance criteria.

In another illustrative embodiment, a computer program productcomprising a computer usable or readable medium having a computerreadable program is provided. The computer readable program, whenexecuted on a processor, causes the processor to perform various onesof, and combinations of, the operations outlined above with regard tothe method illustrative embodiment.

In yet another illustrative embodiment, a system is provided. The systemmay comprise a profile photo enhancement processor configured to performvarious ones of, and combinations of, the operations outlined above withregard to the method illustrative embodiment.

Additional features and advantages of this disclosure will be madeapparent from the following detailed description of illustrativeembodiments that proceeds with reference to the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing and other aspects of the present invention are bestunderstood from the following detailed description when read inconnection with the accompanying drawings. For the purpose ofillustrating the invention, there is shown in the drawings embodimentsthat are presently preferred, it being understood, however, that theinvention is not limited to the specific instrumentalities disclosed.Included in the drawings are the following Figures:

FIG. 1 depicts a flowchart illustrating the functionality of a profilephoto enhancement system, according to embodiments described herein;

FIG. 2 depicts a flowchart illustrating alternate functionality of aprofile photo enhancement system, according to embodiments describedherein; and

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an example data processing system in whichaspects of the illustrative embodiments may be implemented.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

The profile photo enhancement system and method are an improvement onpreviously existing image processing technology. An uploading user canupload one or more images to the system. At the same time, the systemcan receive a specification of one or more acceptance criteria from anonline platform (such as a social network) for which the image is to bedisplayed and uploaded. In an embodiment, the images can be examinedagainst the acceptance criteria by an image processing toolbox. If theimages fail one or more of the acceptance criteria, one or more actionscan be taken, including having the images processed such that they meetthose criteria, or discarding the images. In the event one or more ofthe images pass all acceptance criteria, the images can be accepted bythe system for use on the online platform. Use can include display, bythe online platform, of the accepted image as the uploading user'sprofile picture.

In an alternate embodiment, a requesting user requests to view an imageof the uploading user. Based on the relationship between the requestinguser and the uploading user, varying schemas of acceptance criteria maybe applied. The uploading user, having uploaded one or more images, mayhave each image examined against the varying acceptance criteria. If animage fails to meet one or more acceptance criteria in one schema, theimage may be rejected for that schema and reexamined under anotherschema. The image may be processed to meet a particular schema ofacceptance criteria. If the image meets all acceptance criteria in aparticular schema, the image can be accepted and displayed to therequesting user. The alternate embodiment can be of particular use foronline platforms that allow an uploading user to display differentimages based upon the familiarity of the requesting user to theuploading user. For example, a requesting user with a previousrelationship with the uploading user (exemplified by the requesting userand uploading user being “connected” or “friends” within the onlineplatform), can be shown an informal, non-identification based image ofthe uploading user. In contrast, a requesting user without formalconnection to the uploading user can be shown a formal image of theuploading user such that the image could be used by the requesting userto identify the uploading user in real-space.

The present invention may be a system, a method, and/or a computerprogram product. The computer program product may include a computerreadable storage medium (or media) having computer readable programinstructions thereon for causing a processor to carry out aspects of thepresent invention.

The computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that canretain and store instructions for use by an instruction executiondevice. The computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but isnot limited to, an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device,an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, asemiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of theforegoing. A non-exhaustive list of more specific examples of thecomputer readable storage medium includes the following: a portablecomputer diskette, a head disk, a random access memory (RAM), aread-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROMor Flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), a portablecompact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD),a memory stick, a floppy disk, a mechanically encoded device such aspunch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructionsrecorded thereon, and any suitable combination of the foregoing. Acomputer readable storage medium, as used herein, is not to be construedas being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or other freelypropagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagatingthrough a waveguide or other transmission media (e.g., light pulsespassing through a fiber-optic cable), or electrical signals transmittedthrough a wire.

Computer readable program instructions described herein can bedownloaded to respective computing/processing devices from a computerreadable storage medium or to an external computer or external storagedevice via a network, for example, the Internet, a local area network(LAN), a wide area network (WAN) and/or a wireless network. The networkmay comprise copper transmission cables, optical transmission fibers,wireless transmission, routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers,and/or edge servers. A network adapter card or network interface in eachcomputing/processing device receives computer readable programinstructions from the network and forwards the computer readable programinstructions for storage in a computer readable storage medium withinthe respective computing/processing device.

Computer readable program instructions for carrying out operations ofthe present invention may be assembler instructions,instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions,machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions,state-setting data, or either source code or object code written in anycombination of one or more programming languages, including anobject-oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or thelike, and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C”programming language or similar programming languages. The computerreadable program instructions may execute entirely on the user'scomputer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone softwarepackage, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer,or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario,the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through anytype of network, including LAN or WAN, or the connection may be made toan external computer (for example, through the Internet using anInternet Service Provider). In some embodiments, electronic circuitryincluding, for example, programmable logic circuitry, field-programmablegate arrays (FPGA), or programmable logic arrays (PLA) may execute thecomputer readable program instructions by utilizing state information ofthe computer readable program instructions to personalize the electroniccircuitry, in order to perform aspects of the present invention.

Aspects of the present invention are described herein with reference toflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus(systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of theinvention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchartillustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in theflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented bycomputer readable program instructions.

These computer readable program instructions may be provided to aprocessor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, orother programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, suchthat the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computeror other programmable data processing apparatus, create means forimplementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or blockdiagram block or blocks. These computer readable program instructionsmay also be stored in a computer readable storage medium that can directa computer, a programmable data processing apparatus, and/or otherdevices to function in a particular manner, such that the computerreadable storage medium having instructions stored therein comprises anarticle of manufacture including instructions which implement aspects ofthe function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram blockor blocks.

The computer readable program instructions may also be loaded onto acomputer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other deviceto cause a series of operations steps to be performed on the computer,other programmable apparatus, or other device to produce a computerimplemented process, such that the instructions which execute on thecomputer, other programmable apparatus, or other device implement thefunctions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block orblocks.

The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate thearchitecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementationsof systems, methods, and computer program products according to variousembodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in theflowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portionof instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions forimplementing the specified logical functions. In some alternativeimplementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of theorder noted in the Figures. For example, two blocks shown in successionmay, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks maysometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon thefunctionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of theblock diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocksin the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implementedby special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specifiedfunctions or acts or carry out combinations of special purpose hardwareand computer instructions.

FIG. 1 depicts a flowchart illustrating the functionality of a profilephoto enhancement system, according to embodiments described herein.Through interaction with an online platform 150, the profile photoenhancement system can receive an image from an uploading user 101. Theonline platform 150 can be any online platform that uses images aspersonal identifiers, such as profile photos. Examples include socialmedia platforms like Facebook or LinkedIn, but can also includeenterprise solutions such as Slack or IBM Connections. The profile photoenhancement system can receive from the online platform 150 one or morespecifications of acceptance criteria 102. These acceptance criteria canbe dictated by the constraints of the online platform 150, and will bedescribed in further detail herein.

In an embodiment, the uploading user may also indicate an intent to beassociated with the image received 101, and this intent may be used as aparameter by the online platform 150 to select the acceptance criteriaspecification 102 to be received. For example, an uploading user mayupload one image to represent an informal countenance to be used withdirect connections in a social network, and another for a formalcountenance to be used with any other requesting user who requests theprofile photo of the uploading user.

Using an imaging processing toolbox 103, the image uploaded by theuploading user can be analyzed and compared against the acceptancecriteria specification received from the online platform 150. Theprofile enhancement system can determine whether the uploaded imagemeets all of the acceptance criteria 104. If the image meets allacceptance criteria, the profile photo enhancement system can accept theimage 105, and can also notify the uploading user of the image'sacceptance. In an embodiment, acceptance of the image can constitutesaving the image to a repository of profile images, or displaying theimage on the online platform as the uploading user's profile image. Ifthe uploaded image fails to meet one or more acceptance criteria, theprofile photo enhancement system can proceed to take an action 106. Inan embodiment, the action can be to discard the uploaded image, and canalso include notifying the uploading user that the image was rejected.Alternately, the profile photo enhancement system can return theuploaded image to the image processing toolbox 103 in order for theimage processing toolbox to edit or adjust the image based upon the oneor more failed acceptance criteria.

Once edited, the uploaded image can be reexamined by the profile photoenhancement system to determine if the image now meets all acceptancecriteria 104. If so, the image can be accepted 105; if not, the systemcan take further action 106. In an embodiment, the system can proceedfor a predetermined number of analyses and edits before the image isultimately discarded.

An acceptance criterion can be a predetermined number of focus itemsthat must be present in the image. Focus items can include human faces.The image processing toolbox can detect the number of focus itemspresent on the image. In the event the image processing toolbox detectsmore than the predetermined number of focus items, the system canhighlight those focus items on a display. The uploading user can thenmanually select the particular focus items, such that the predeterminednumber of focus items is selected. The image processing toolbox can thencrop the image to only display the correct focus items, at which pointthe image can be reexamined by the system. Alternately, if the imageprocessing toolbox detects less than the predetermined number of focusitems (which can occur if no focus items are present, or if the image isof such poor quality or low pixilation that the system cannot detect afocus item), the system can alert the uploading user that the image doesnot contain the needed amount of focus items, and can additionallyprompt the uploading user to upload a second image for review by theimage processing toolbox.

The profile photo enhancement system can utilize identitycharacteristics about the uploading user to automatically select aparticular focus item. For instance, the system can receive genderinformation based upon information the uploading user had previouslyuploaded to the online platform. If the uploaded image contains twofocus items, the image processing toolbox can determine whether thefocus items show faces of different gender, and select the focus itemcorresponding to the uploading user's designated gender. A similaranalysis can be performed to distinguish focus items based on ethnicity,age, or other personal characteristics that may be reflected in anuploaded image. The personal characteristic limits can be derived fromanalysis by the system of the uploading user's profile on the onlineplatform. Natural language processing can be utilized to parse personalcharacteristics of the uploading user, which can be incorporated intothe analysis of the image by the image processing toolbox. Alternately,if the uploaded image is non-deterministic generally, the system canstore the image for use as an image to be displayed for familiarrequesters, which will be described in more detail in FIG. 2.

Acceptance criteria can include predetermined length and widthconstraints for the image or primary focus item. Predeterminedconstraints can include a limitation on the overall dimensions of theimage or primary focus item, the ratio of length to width, or minimumrequirements regarding the same. If the system detects that the image orprimary focus item fails to meet the predetermined length and widthconstraint, the image processing toolbox can manipulate the image inorder for the image to conform to the constraints. Manipulation caninclude cropping, stretching, shrinking, or resizing the uploaded image.

Acceptance criteria can include predetermined color constraints for theimage. Color constraints could require that the image be in black andwhite, greyscale, sepia, or entirely in color. In the event the colorconstraints require an image having black and white, greyscale, or sepiaimage, the uploading of a color image by the uploading user can triggerthe image processing toolbox to convert the color image into black andwhite, greyscale, or sepia as the acceptance criteria dictate.Alternately, if the acceptance criteria require a color image and theuploading user uploads a non-colored or sepia image, the imageprocessing toolbox, upon detecting a lack of color in the image, cantrigger the profile photo enhancement system to notify the user that theimage has been rejected due to lack of coloration, and a replacementcolored image must be uploaded to the system.

Acceptance criteria can include a predetermined contrast ratio between aprimary focus item and the image background. In the event the imageuploaded by the uploading user is too washed out or too dark, the imageprocessing toolbox can manipulate the image to make the image conform tothe predetermined contrast ratio requirements. Manipulation can involvealteration of the image contrast, brightness, or sharpness. In the eventthe image processing toolbox cannot manipulate the image sufficiently toconform the image to the acceptance criteria, the profile photoenhancement system can disregard the image and prompt the uploading userto upload a supplementary or replacement image.

An acceptance criterion can be a predetermined shape constraint for anacceptable image. Various online platforms use different imagegeometries for use in their systems. For example, some online platformsrequire square images, while others require circular images. In theevent the image fails to conform to the predetermined shape constraint,the image processing toolbox can manipulate the image such that theimage conforms to the predetermined shape constraint. Manipulation caninclude cropping, stretching, shrinking, or resizing the uploaded image.

An acceptance criterion for specifications requiring the presence of ahuman face can be determining a predesignated orientation of the humanface in the image. In an embodiment, the predesignated orientation canbe facing forward and vertically oriented. The image processing toolboxcan analyze the uploaded image to determine if the prerequisite featuresof the predesignated orientation exist. In a face forward model,prerequisite features can require the detection of two eyes above a noseabove a mouth. Detection of a single eye above a nose above a mouth canindicate a side-profile view, which can cause the system to prompt theuploading user to upload an image conforming to the predesignatedorientation.

It is understood that processing of the image by the image processingtoolbox and reexamination by the profile photo enhancement system forvarious acceptance criteria can occur linearly or in synchronousfashion. The system can examine and/or process the image in multipleiterations in order to create a conforming image, or the system canalter multiple characteristics of the image at one time. For instance, amisshaped, colored, and multiple focused image can be processed by theimage processing toolbox such that the image is cropped to the correctshape, where the crop excludes the non-primary focus items, and theimage can be converted to the color scheme required by the onlineplatform.

In an embodiment, the profile photo enhancement system can allow forimages that do not conform to a particular specification of acceptancecriteria to be stored for possible analysis against a secondspecification of acceptance criteria. For example, while a particularimage may not be acceptable against the acceptance criteria for anenterprise social network, the image may be acceptable for theacceptance criteria of an informal social network. The profile photoenhancement system can store and notify users via a display of thepotential alternate uses of a particular uploaded image.

FIG. 2 depicts a flowchart illustrating alternate functionality of aprofile photo enhancement system, according to embodiments describedherein. Through interaction with an online platform 250, the profilephoto enhancement system can receive a plurality of images from anuploading user 201. In an embodiment, the plurality of images canoriginate from a real-time, prompted upload of the user. Alternately,the plurality of images can originate from a repository of images thathave been previously uploaded to the online platform, which can includeimages uploaded directly by the user, but can also include imagesuploaded by third parties in which the user has been previouslyidentified.

The profile photo enhancement system can receive a request from arequesting user for an image of the uploading user 208. In anembodiment, a request from a requesting user can be triggered by therequesting user visiting the uploading user's unique profile on theonline platform. Alternately, a request may be triggered by activationof a magnification of a previously displayed profile image by therequesting user.

The uploading of the plurality of images can occur concurrently with therequesting of the images, or the requesting of images can occur at somelater time after the uploading and processing of images by the profilephoto enhancement system. The online platform 250 can be any onlineplatform that uses images as personal identifiers, such as profilephotos. Examples include social media platforms like Facebook orLinkedIn, but can also include enterprise solutions such as Slack or IBMConnections. The profile photo enhancement system can receive from theonline platform 250 one or more specifications of acceptance criteria202. These acceptance criteria can be dictated by the constraints of theonline platform 250 as well as by the relationship between therequesting user and the uploading user, and will be described in furtherdetail herein.

Using an imaging processing toolbox 203, each image in the plurality ofimages uploaded by the uploading user can be analyzed and comparedagainst the acceptance criteria specification. The profile enhancementsystem can determine whether each uploaded image meets the acceptancecriteria 204. If an image meets all acceptance criteria, the profilephoto enhancement system can accept the image 205. In an embodiment,acceptance of the image can constitute displaying the image on theonline platform to the requesting user as the uploading user's profilephoto. If an uploaded image fails to meet the acceptance criteria, theprofile photo enhancement system can proceed to take one or more actions206. In an embodiment, an action can be to discard the uploaded imagefor the particular set of acceptance criteria. However, the image cancontinue to be stored for analysis by the profile photo enhancementsystem against an alternate set of acceptance criteria, as the image maybe acceptable in another context depending on a subsequent requestinguser's relationship to the uploading user. A subsequent requesting usercan be a separate individual, or can be the original requesting userhaving changed familiarity or locational relationships with theuploading user. Alternately, the profile photo enhancement system canreturn the uploaded image to the image processing toolbox 203 in orderfor the image processing toolbox to edit or adjust the image based uponthe one or more failed acceptance criteria, much in the same manner asdescribed in FIG. 1.

Once edited, the processed image can be reexamined by the profile photoenhancement system to determine if the image now meets all theacceptance criteria 204. If so, the processed image can be accepted 205;if not, the system can reject the processed image 207 as a response tothe current image request 208. However, the original unedited image canremain in storage for analysis under an alternate specification ofacceptance criteria.

In one embodiment, for a particular image request 208, the images of theplurality received 201 can be examined until an image is accepted 205 oruntil all images in the plurality have been rejected 207. If an acceptedimage is found, it can be provided to the requesting user as a responseto the request. Otherwise, the profile photo enhancement system canprovide an alternative to an uploaded image as the response to the imagerequest 208, such as a blank silhouette of a person.

In addition to the specification of acceptance criteria being defined bythe constraints of the online platform 250 (as described in FIG. 1.),the acceptance criteria can additionally be varied by the relationshipof the requesting user to the uploading user. This capability isparticularly useful in online platforms 250 that allow for a variabledisplay of photos based on the relationship between its users, but canbe used on any online platform that allows alteration of profile photos.

Acceptance criteria can be varied based upon the familiarity of therequesting user to the uploading user. Many online platforms allow usersto establish formal connections, such as through the use of friend orconnection requests. Thus, the acceptance criteria by which theplurality of images uploaded by the uploading user is measured can alterbased upon whether a formal connection between the requesting user andthe uploading user has been established. For example, a request for animage by a requesting user having a formal connection with the uploadinguser can allow the system to receive relaxed acceptance criteria, suchas disregarding a restriction on focus items present in the uploadedimage. Thus, the requesting user can view images uploaded by theuploading user that do not necessary have to show a focus item, such asa human face, and can instead view a profile image that may reflect theuploading user's personality (for example, artwork or images of theuploading user's family). In contrast, a request for an image by arequesting user lacking a formal connection with the uploading user canallow the system to receive strict acceptance criteria, such that anacceptable image may only be a profile photo showing the user's face, orother “utilitarian” image.

Acceptance criteria can be altered not only based upon the presence orabsence of a formal connection between the requesting user and theuploading user, but can also alter based upon the duration the formalconnection has been in place. In an embodiment, the longer the durationof the formal connection, the laxer the acceptance criteria received bythe profile photo enhancement system can be. Similarly, the shorter theduration of the formal connection, the stricter the acceptance criteria.In an embodiment, a predetermined formal connection time can be used totrigger between strict or lax criteria. Thus, a requesting user having anewer formal relationship can be shown a utilitarian profile photoconforming to stricter acceptance criteria, while a requesting userhaving an older formal relationship can be shown a profile photo withlaxer requirements, which may be more expressive of the uploading user'spersonality.

Acceptance criteria can be altered based upon the locationalrelationship between the requesting user and the uploading user. Theprofile photo enhancement system can use a location module 260 todetermine the relative locations of the requesting user and theuploading user. In an embodiment, the location module 260 canincorporate geofencing capability, such that a proscribed boundary canbe implemented. If a requesting user is within a certain distance of theuploading user, the acceptance criteria can be strengthened or relaxeddepending on the requirements of the online platform. For example, in anenterprise online platform, a requesting user being within the geofenceboundary (which can be placed such that it encompasses an office of theenterprise) can trigger a relaxation of the acceptance criteria, whereasa user outside the geofence can trigger stricter acceptance criteria.Alternately, close proximity of the requesting user to the uploadinguser can trigger strict acceptance criteria (which can result in animage being displayed that is more conducive to physical identificationof the uploading user), while greater separation between the requestinguser and the uploading user can trigger stricter acceptance criteria.

As with the online platform acceptance criteria described in FIG. 1, theprofile photo enhancement system can consider each variable affectingthe acceptance criteria in isolation or in any amount of combination.Additionally, the system can allow the uploading user to pre-identifyimages as potentially being acceptable for strict or relaxed acceptancecriteria. The system may bind the various images as sprites, layeredGIFs, layered PNGs, or other dual display images. The profile photoenhancement system can include an additional managerial approvalmechanism, whereby a manager can override the selections of an uploadinguser, and/or can deny or approve uploaded photos for potential displayby the online platform.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an example data processing system 300 inwhich aspects of the illustrative embodiments can be implemented. Dataprocessing system 300 is an example of a computer, such as a server orclient, in which computer usable code or instructions implementing theprocess for illustrative embodiments of the present invention arelocated. In one embodiment, FIG. 3 represents a server computing device,such as a server, which implements the profile photo enhancement systemdescribed herein.

In the depicted example, data processing system 300 can employ a hubarchitecture including a north bridge and memory controller hub (NB/MCH)301 and south bridge and input/output (I/O) controller hub (SB/ICH) 302.Processing unit 303, main memory 304, and graphics processor 305 can beconnected to the NB/MCH 301. Graphics processor 305 can be connected tothe NB/MCH through an accelerated graphics port (AGP).

In the depicted example, the network adapter 306 connects to the SB/ICH302. The audio adapter 307, keyboard and mouse adapter 308, modem 309,read only memory (ROM) 310, hard disk drive (HDD) 311, optical drive (CDor DVD) 312, universal serial bus (USB) ports and other communicationports 313, and the PCI/PCIe devices 314 can connect to the SB/ICH 302through bus system 316. PCI/PCIe devices 314 may include Ethernetadapters, add-in cards, and PC cards for notebook computers. ROM 310 maybe, for example, a flash basic input/output system (BIOS). The HDD 311and optical drive 312 can use an integrated drive electronics (IDE) orserial advanced technology attachment (SATA) interface. The super I/O(SIO) device 315 can be connected to the SB/ICH.

An operating system can run on processing unit 303. The operating systemcan coordinate and provide control of various components within the dataprocessing system 300. As a client, the operating system can be acommercially available operating system. An object-oriented programmingsystem, such as the Java™ programming system, may run in conjunctionwith the operating system and provide calls to the operating system fromthe object-oriented programs or applications executing on the dataprocessing system 300. As a server, the data processing system 300 canbe an IBM® eServer™ System P® running the Advanced Interactive Executiveoperating system or the Linux operating system. The data processingsystem 300 can be a symmetric multiprocessor (SMP) system that caninclude a plurality of processors in the processing unit 303.Alternatively, a single processor system may be employed.

Instructions for the operating system, the object-oriented programmingsystem, and applications or programs are located on storage devices,such as the HDD 311, and are loaded into the main memory 304 forexecution by the processing unit 303. The processes for embodiments ofthe profile photo enhancement system can be performed by the processingunit 303 using computer usable program code, which can be located in amemory such as, for example, main memory 304, ROM 310, or in one or moreperipheral devices.

A bus system 316 can be comprised of one or more busses. The bus system316 can be implemented using any type of communication fabric orarchitecture that can provide for a transfer of data between differentcomponents or devices attached to the fabric or architecture. Acommunication unit such as the modem 309 or network adapter 306 caninclude one or more devices that can be used to transmit and receivedata.

Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the hardwaredepicted in FIG. 3 may vary depending on the implementation. Otherinternal hardware or peripheral devices, such as flash memory,equivalent non-volatile memory, or optical disk drives may be used inaddition to or in place of the hardware depicted. Moreover, the dataprocessing system 300 can take the form of any of a number of differentdata processing systems, including but not limited to, client computingdevices, server computing devices, tablet computers, laptop computers,telephone or other communication devices, personal digital assistants,and the like. Essentially, data processing system 300 can be any knownor later developed data processing system without architecturallimitation.

The present description and claims may make use of the terms “a,” “atleast one of,” and “one or more of,” with regard to particular featuresand elements of the illustrative embodiments. It should be appreciatedthat these terms and phrases are intended to state that there is atleast one of the particular feature or element present in the particularillustrative embodiment, but that more than one can also be present.That is, these terms/phrases are not intended to limit the descriptionor claims to a single feature/element being present or require that aplurality of such features/elements be present. To the contrary, theseterms/phrases only require at least a single feature/element with thepossibility of a plurality of such features/elements being within thescope of the description and claims.

In addition, it should be appreciated that the following descriptionuses a plurality of various examples for various elements of theillustrative embodiments to further illustrate example implementationsof the illustrative embodiments and to aid in the understanding of themechanisms of the illustrative embodiments. These examples are intendedto be non-limiting and are not exhaustive of the various possibilitiesfor implementing the mechanisms of the illustrative embodiments. It willbe apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art in view of the presentdescription that there are many other alternative implementations forthese various elements that may be utilized in addition to, or inreplacement of, the examples provided herein without departing from thespirit and scope of the present invention.

The system and processes of the figures are not exclusive. Othersystems, processes, and menus may be derived in accordance with theprinciples of embodiments described herein to accomplish the sameobjectives. It is to be understood that the embodiments and variationsshown and described herein are for illustration purposes only.Modifications to the current design may be implemented by those skilledin the art, without departing from the scope of the embodiments. Asdescribed herein, the various systems, subsystems, agents, managers andprocesses can be implemented using hardware components, softwarecomponents, and/or combinations thereof. No claim element herein is tobe construed under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph,unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for.”

Although the invention has been described with reference to exemplaryembodiments, it is not limited thereto. Those skilled in the art willappreciate that numerous changes and modifications may be made to thepreferred embodiments of the invention and that such changes andmodifications may be made without departing from the true spirit of theinvention. It is therefore intended that the appended claims beconstrued to cover all such equivalent variations as fall within thetrue spirit and scope of the invention.

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer implemented method in a dataprocessing system comprising a processor and a memory, the memorycomprising instructions that are executed by the processor to cause theprocessor to implement a system for providing profile photo enhancement,the method comprising: receiving, from an online platform, one or morespecifications for image acceptance criteria; receiving, through anuploading user, a plurality of images; receiving, through a requestinguser, a request to view an image; selecting a particular specificationfor image acceptance criteria; for each image in the plurality ofimages: examining, through an image processing toolbox, the image todetermine if the image acceptance criteria are met; if all acceptancecriteria are met, providing the image to the requesting user; if one ormore acceptance criteria are not met, taking one or more actions toprocess the image, reexamining, through the image processing toolbox,the processed image to determine if the image acceptance criteria aremet; if all acceptance criteria are met, providing the processed imageto the requesting user; and if one or more of the image acceptancecriteria are not met, disregarding the processed image for theparticular specification for image acceptance criteria.
 2. The method asrecited in claim 1, further comprising: deriving personalcharacteristics of the uploading user from a profile of the uploadinguser through natural language processing.
 3. The method as recited inclaim 1, further comprising: receiving, through a subsequent requestinguser, a request to view an image; selecting an alternate specificationfor image acceptance criteria; for each image in the plurality ofimages: examining, through the image processing toolbox, the image todetermine if the alternate image acceptance criteria are met; if allacceptance criteria are met, providing the image to the requesting user;if one or more alternate acceptance criteria are not met, taking one ormore actions to process the image; reexamining, through the imageprocessing toolbox, the processed image to determine if the alternateimage acceptance criteria are met; if all alternate acceptance criteriaare met, providing the processed image to the requesting user; and ifone or more of the alternate image acceptance criteria are not met,disregarding the processed image for the alternate specification forimage acceptance criteria.
 4. The method as recited in claim 1, furthercomprising: determining, through a location module, the distance betweenthe requesting user and the uploading user; if the distance between therequesting user and the uploading user is greater than a predeterminedthreshold, selecting a particular specification for image acceptancecriteria; and if the distance between the requesting user and theuploading user is not greater than a predetermined threshold, selectingan alternate specification for image acceptance criteria.
 5. The methodas recited in claim 1, further comprising: determining whether a formalconnection exists between the requesting user and the uploading user; ifa formal connection exists between the requesting user and the uploadinguser, selecting a particular specification for image acceptancecriteria; and if a formal connection does not exist between therequesting user and the uploading user, selecting an alternatespecification for image acceptance criteria.
 6. The method as recited inclaim 5, further comprising: if a formal connection exists between therequesting user and the uploading user, determining the duration theformal connection has existed; if the formal connection has existed forlonger than a predetermined threshold, selecting a particularspecification for image acceptance criteria; and if the formalconnection has existed for shorter than a predetermined threshold,selecting an alternate specification for image acceptance criteria. 7.The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising: for each image inthe plurality of images, prompting the uploading user to categorize theimage according to an intent associated with the one or morespecifications of image acceptance criteria.
 8. A computer programproduct for providing profile photo enhancement, the computer programproduct comprising a computer readable storage medium having programinstructions embodied therewith, the program instructions executable bya processor to cause the processor to: receive, from an online platform,one or more specifications for image acceptance criteria; receive,through an uploading user, a plurality of images; receive, through arequesting user, a request to view an image; select a particularspecification for image acceptance criteria; for each image in theplurality of images: examine, through an image processing toolbox, theimage to determine if the image acceptance criteria are met; if allacceptance criteria are met, provide the image to the requesting user;if one or more acceptance criteria are not met, take one or more actionsto process the image, reexamine, through the image processing toolbox,the processed image to determine if the image acceptance criteria aremet; if all acceptance criteria are met, provide the processed image tothe requesting user; and if one or more of the image acceptance criteriaare not met, disregard the processed image for the particularspecification for image acceptance criteria.
 9. The computer programproduct as recited in claim 8, wherein the image acceptance criteriainclude predetermined length and width constraints, including aconstraint of an overall dimension of a primary focus item in eachimage, and a constraint of a ratio of length to width of each image. 10.The computer program product as recited in claim 8, wherein theprocessor is further configured to: receive, through a subsequentrequesting user, a request to view an image; select an alternatespecification for image acceptance criteria; for each image in theplurality of images: examine, through the image processing toolbox, theimage to determine if the alternate image acceptance criteria are met;if all acceptance criteria are met, provide the image to the requestinguser; if one or more alternate acceptance criteria are not met, take oneor more actions to process the image, reexamine, through the imageprocessing toolbox, the processed image to determine if the alternateimage acceptance criteria are met; if all alternate acceptance criteriaare met, provide the processed image to the requesting user; and if oneor more of the alternate image acceptance criteria are not met,disregard the processed image for the alternate specification for imageacceptance criteria.
 11. The computer program product as recited inclaim 8, wherein the processor is further configured to: determine,through a location module, the distance between the requesting user andthe uploading user; if the distance between the requesting user and theuploading user is greater than a predetermined threshold, select aparticular specification for image acceptance criteria; and if thedistance between the requesting user and the uploading user is notgreater than a predetermined threshold, select an alternatespecification for image acceptance criteria.
 12. The computer programproduct as recited in claim 8, wherein the processor is furtherconfigured to: determine whether a formal connection exists between therequesting user and the uploading user; if a formal connection existsbetween the requesting user and the uploading user, select a particularspecification for image acceptance criteria; and if a formal connectiondoes not exist between the requesting user and the uploading user,select an alternate specification for image acceptance criteria.
 13. Thecomputer program product as recited in claim 12, wherein the processoris further configured to: if a formal connection exists between therequesting user and the uploading user, determine the duration theformal connection has existed; if the formal connection has existed forlonger than a predetermined threshold, select a particular specificationfor image acceptance criteria; and if the formal connection has existedfor shorter than a predetermined threshold, select an alternatespecification for image acceptance criteria.
 14. The computer programproduct as recited in claim 8, wherein the processor is furtherconfigured to: for each image in the plurality of images, prompt theuploading user to categorize the image according to an intent associatedwith the one or more specifications of image acceptance criteria.
 15. Asystem for profile photo enhancement, comprising: a profile photoenhancement processor configured to: receive, from an online platform,one or more specifications for image acceptance criteria; receive,through an uploading user, a plurality of images; receive, through arequesting user, a request to view an image; select a particularspecification for image acceptance criteria; for each image in theplurality of images: examine, through an image processing toolbox, theimage to determine if the image acceptance criteria are met; if allacceptance criteria are met, provide the image to the requesting user;if one or more acceptance criteria are not met, take one or more actionsto process the image, reexamine, through the image processing toolbox,the processed image to determine if the image acceptance criteria aremet; if all acceptance criteria are met, provide the processed image tothe requesting user; and if one or more of the image acceptance criteriaare not met, disregard the processed image for the particularspecification for image acceptance criteria.
 16. The system as recitedin claim 15, wherein the profile photo enhancement processor is furtherconfigured to derive personal characteristics of the uploading user froma profile of the uploading user through natural language processing. 17.The system as recited in claim 15, wherein the profile photo enhancementprocessor is further configured to: receive, through a subsequentrequesting user, a request to view an image; select an alternatespecification for image acceptance criteria; for each image in theplurality of images: examine, through the image processing toolbox, theimage to determine if the alternate image acceptance criteria are met;if all acceptance criteria are met, provide the image to the requestinguser; if one or more alternate acceptance criteria are not met, take oneor more actions to process the image, reexamine, through the imageprocessing toolbox, the processed image to determine if the alternateimage acceptance criteria are met; if all alternate acceptance criteriaare met, provide the processed image to the requesting user; and if oneor more of the alternate image acceptance criteria are not met,disregard the processed image for the alternate specification for imageacceptance criteria.
 18. The system as recited in claim 15, wherein theprofile photo enhancement processor is further configured to: determine,through a location module, the distance between the requesting user andthe uploading user; if the distance between the requesting user and theuploading user is greater than a predetermined threshold, select aparticular specification for image acceptance criteria; and if thedistance between the requesting user and the uploading user is notgreater than a predetermined threshold, select an alternatespecification for image acceptance criteria.
 19. The system as recitedin claim 15, wherein the profile photo enhancement processor is furtherconfigured to: determine whether a formal connection exists between therequesting user and the uploading user; if a formal connection existsbetween the requesting user and the uploading user, select a particularspecification for image acceptance criteria; and if a formal connectiondoes not exist between the requesting user and the uploading user,select an alternate specification for image acceptance criteria.
 20. Thesystem as recited in claim 19, wherein the profile photo enhancementprocessor is further configured to: if a formal connection existsbetween the requesting user and the uploading user, determine theduration the formal connection has existed; if the formal connection hasexisted for longer than a predetermined threshold, select a particularspecification for image acceptance criteria; and if the formalconnection has existed for shorter than a predetermined threshold,select an alternate specification for image acceptance criteria.